Table 1

Comparison of the performance of different types of flexible EMI shielding films

Mesh type Optical transmittance (%) Average EMI SE (dB) Frequency (GHz) Manufacturing methods Ref.
Ag mesh 82.7 56.2 8–18 Photolithography + scraping of Ag ink [62]
Ag nanowires 67.8 44 10 Laser marking + transfer printing + hot pressing [63]
Cu mesh 84.3 49.38 1 Cracked template + magnetron sputtering + electroplating of Cu [64]
Single-crystal graphene 89.4 8.02 8.2–12.4 Chemical vapor deposition [65]
Single-walled carbon nanotube 90 28 10 Transfer printing [66]
MXene film 33.4 20 8.2–12.4 Spray and spin coating [67]
Ag/Cu mesh 84.4 29.414 8.2–12.4 This work

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.